What's better than a Kim Campbell? How about a Hillary Rodham Clinton?"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton met on Sunday with New York’s Democratic governor-elect to solicit his support for her likely White House bid, the latest indication she is stepping up plans to join a growing field of potential contenders for 2008. . . "Obviously (being a female) this excites me to nooo end. To have the leader of the free world be a woman would change the society around us. . . How? I don't know, it might be just what we need, it might screw us over even more.
And don't give me the crap that having a female for President wouldn't change anything. If that was the case they would have had one a hundred years ago.
Now obviously none of this is set in stone. There are many others that could run for and win leadership of the Democratic party (including my personal favourite: Barack Obama).
Still thrilling!
2 comments:
Sooo much better than Kim Campell.
Of course having a female president - particularly this one - would change things. How could it not?
This is most definitely an exciting time. Will she win in 2008? Probably not (especially considering how conservative the Southern States tend to be). But it means things are changing. And I'm sure that we'll see a female president witihin our lifetime.
So will America be perfect? No. Will [President] Clinton be entirely uncorrupted by power? Nope. But, as we've said many times, there are huge differences among males and females. And I am convinced that the simple solution to all of the world's major problems is a little less pride and a little more compassion. Of course, her influences will be limited by a largely male Congress, but it's definitely a start.
And how awesome would it be to call Bill Clinton the First Gentleman?
P.S. booo, who studies for Englishhhh?
I don't know if having a Female president would change much.
I'm all for a female President.
I'm all against a Hillary Clinton president.
There's just something about her that I really, really, really don't like.
Post a Comment